form opposition GDSK
The following letter I wrote with the help of forms on the Internet, 2008 to appeal against a shameless appeal to the charging GDSK. I found this letter a second time to use to against a second attempt by the opposition GDSK appeal. So I've never received a claim from the GDSK. My opposition seems to have worked.
Since I am not the only one who ever had with the GDSK problems, I would like to introduce you to my letter as a form available. Just in case her once in the same dilemma comes. Meanwhile, many now even in China, Taobao in stores and others. Sunday, November 29, 2009
Time Warner Cable Phone Hookup
you have to do is copy the text to replace the question mark, print and go!
Good luck! City, "". Month 200?
opposition to your bill from ?.??. 200?
invoice number. ???????
GdSK-No. ??????? HAWB number. ??????? POD No.: ???????
ATC-REF: ???????
Ladies and gentlemen, I hereby
raise objection to the above invoice GdSK. At the same time I agree with you that some of the required amount of import tax plus duty of ??,?? EUR has been transferred to your account. Thus, it was your account to ??,?? EUR ("handling fee") plus tax cut.
Reason:
ATC-REF: ???????
Ladies and gentlemen, I hereby
raise objection to the above invoice GdSK. At the same time I agree with you that some of the required amount of import tax plus duty of ??,?? EUR has been transferred to your account. Thus, it was your account to ??,?? EUR ("handling fee") plus tax cut.
Reason:
The invoiced amount of ??,?? EUR for a "handling fee" is incomprehensible, unconscionable and therefore invalid. In the official confirmation of the delivery of GDSK ?.??. 200? I noticed the attempt to issue GdSK a charter with the phrase "commit This is to us all to be paid on the item resting costs."
Before the two options provided:
- a "free" shipping back to the to apply for sender or
- the GDSK against a "handling fee" of ??,?? EUR to carry out the customs clearance,
you left me no real choice, for a return to the sender is unreasonable. This return would be for the sender of a price tag, but even very expensive, and those costs, he would certainly put me into account. I also wanted, of course, to get the already paid for shipping!
I found myself so in a predicament because I had to appear entering into this business as the lesser evil. In addition, the provision of transit service has been paid already linked to the illegal contract for customs clearance.
are further performance and reward each other in a striking discrepancy. Other postal operators provide this service free of charge or at a fraction of the price charged by GdSK. Consequently, characteristics of usury under § 138 BGB are met adequately. It is therefore an immoral transaction, which is therefore void.
I would also have to point out that you ignored my information on the nature and contents of the package and the program incorrectly registered at the customs office. This results in higher tariffs and me a big hassle, since I now appeal again to the customs office must be a contradiction to try to compensate me by you damage again.
Before the two options provided:
- a "free" shipping back to the to apply for sender or
- the GDSK against a "handling fee" of ??,?? EUR to carry out the customs clearance,
you left me no real choice, for a return to the sender is unreasonable. This return would be for the sender of a price tag, but even very expensive, and those costs, he would certainly put me into account. I also wanted, of course, to get the already paid for shipping!
I found myself so in a predicament because I had to appear entering into this business as the lesser evil. In addition, the provision of transit service has been paid already linked to the illegal contract for customs clearance.
are further performance and reward each other in a striking discrepancy. Other postal operators provide this service free of charge or at a fraction of the price charged by GdSK. Consequently, characteristics of usury under § 138 BGB are met adequately. It is therefore an immoral transaction, which is therefore void.
I would also have to point out that you ignored my information on the nature and contents of the package and the program incorrectly registered at the customs office. This results in higher tariffs and me a big hassle, since I now appeal again to the customs office must be a contradiction to try to compensate me by you damage again.
Further legal action I reserve the right. It is permissible to note that usury is punishable under § 291 of the Penal Code and is in very serious cases with imprisonment from six Months shall be punished by up to ten years.
Sincerely,
???????
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment